I do wish New Labour hadn't given the police forces of this country such a burden with their political correctness nonsense and their Stasi-like approach to dealing with people they can't abide. Instead of debating with the BNP or tackling head-on the political weaknesses of their case, New Labour acts like a grumpy dandy caught out with a dirty shirt. It's all humbug and high-falluting posturing.
The BNP is a legal political party. They registered accordingly with the Electoral Commission set up by Blair. But instead of countering BNP policies, New Labour gets the police to round up their canvassers and chuck them in jail for a couple of hours.
Now we arrive at the ridiculous position of five leafleters suing the South Wales Police. BNP Deputy Leader Simon Darby said, “Normally they have a look at the leaflet, check it and maybe take names and addresses. In this case they were arrested. Obviously, they were not very happy about it. They were asking all kinds of questions about our movements in South Wales. Certainly there are good grounds for compensation.” The BNP compensated for this? How much, I wonder, if it happens?
The police have no business rounding up people at election times. Leave that kind of stuff to Mugabe! All the moron who authorised this is doing is giving a potential windfall to the BNP and giving them the opportunity to act as the browbeaten innocents!
New Labour - New Morons!
Can the PM keep his promises?
-
The Labour Manifesto set out two very clear goals or overriding themes.
They would bring in a politics driven by a sense of service, not based on
party or ...
21 hours ago
.jpg)
8 comments:
Good Luck to the BNP.
We, the English ethny, are the browbeaten innocents.
The BNP are our lone defenders.
All ethnic groups are descended from other ethnic groups. The English are longer-lived as a distinct historic community than almost any other though, so it's hard to see what you're getting at - especially with the GK, 1/4b blood, non-europe tripe.
Go back far enough and you be in the swamp boy! So?
The particular attack on a particular ethnic group constitutes racism. By all means say that no peoples, no ethnic groups, and no nations exist. You'll be laughed at 'cos you'll be talking nonsense... but don't deconstruct and attack one particular people whose qualifications for distincness happen to exceptionally strong.
Why on earth would you -- especially as you have a blog supposedly devoted to their interests?
And people wonder WHY the BNP?
I'm not sure I follow you. Swamp or no swamp, it's just factual to say that the English, just like most nations that have had a past based on travels, will be partly of mixed heritage.
Ethnicity and race are not the same, granted. But the BNP talks of "whites" as if they were some pure-bred elite. My point is that we are not.
I have to conclude you are wrong. You attribute things which haven't been raised. In politics, that's called a smokescreen.
You attribute things which haven't been raised. In politics, that's called a smokescreen.
Show me where the BNP talk of pure breeds and about such status qualifying particular people for particular advantages. Show me where the BNP put quotes around the names of racial groups, like your “whites” and talk about supremacist ‘elites’.
These are your terms, your claims, your false attributions. If there’s a smokescreen, that too is yours.
I attribute positions to you based on what you say. It is you who attacks particular peoples and say their racial histories limit their political rights today.
Good grief! You pick up on points and twist them, don't you. "such status qualifying particular people for particular advantages". Where did that come from?
If the BNP is happy to have Britons from all backgrounds as members, then I'm happy too. I just get the feeling you're a bit hung up on where we all came from.
Good grief! You pick up on points and twist them, don't you. "such status qualifying particular people for particular advantages". Where did that come from?
Your comments: “Ethnically, the [English] come out as mixed as any other European country”, and “the BNP talks of ["whites"] as if they were some pure-bred elite. My point is that we are not”, only seem to have any practical meaning if a people's distinctions (or lack of) qualify or disqualify them for political rights. Surely that was your point, the motive behind your slurs? You didn’t simply want to knock the English and White peoples generally -for the fun of it- did you?
If the BNP is happy to have Britons from all backgrounds as members, then I'm happy too. I just get the feeling you're a bit hung up on where we all came from.
The BNP are an ethnic nationalist party, so just like most political parties in Britain have usually believed, the BNP think Britain belongs to the British peoples. This is the usual Conservative view in historic terms, and it was even the view of the Labour Party for the first half of its existence.
The BNP exist only to correct the injustice that occurred around the middle of the last century, when Britain’s major parties rightly came to the view that the peoples of Africa and Asia should control their homelands in their own interests, but perversely decided to withdraw that advantage from Britain’s own peoples.
The BNP are not the racist party - they say the rights and advantages that the other parties defend for Africans and Asians also should be granted to Europeans including Brits.
Post a Comment